Bright conservative thinker and author Dinesh D'Sousa is in favor of some redistribution of wealth even though he thinks Government should be limited to protecting the citizens and agrees that the government is not protecting the citizens when it redistributes their wealth but he still favors some redistribtion; he favors redistribution of wealth even though he agrees it creates a perverse incentive and is morally wrong. Go figure. Interestingly, he agrees there is a fundamental difference between taxing citizen for a service that he wants and needs on the one hand, and taxing him to give his money to someone else. But still, he is in favor of some redistribution of wealth which he defends as tensions in the system. I call them contradictions. He says that these tensions are inherent in a democracy, and when I point out that our original system was not a democracy but a Constitutional Republic he agrees. Part one